Mustang dyno correction factor

What would the difference be? I don't know what that factor number actually does to the results. He was NOT a tuner, only a Dyno operator and had no reason to inflate figures. 24. And the car ran lean, ~13. In other words, if a vehicle is tested at sea level on a sunny and warm day, the dyno will apply a SAE correction factor to adjust the conditions to a standard temperature and pressure (STP) and the vehicle's on-board computer will also apply certain set of operating parameters. Hey guys, i just got back from the shop after getting my car dyno'd on a Mustang Dyno. 5% lower. However, these  (Inlet air temp after intercooler for example). Jun 10, 2007 · When testing was performed on the Dynojet, the correction factor was 1. 066 which will add 6. 0 All of these at-the-wheels figures were obtained in 4th gear on a Dynojet 248 chassis dyno and include a 3% SAE weather correction It's that Virtual Dyno so closely reflects actual power output, that it's correction factors mimic SAE correction factors used on LC Dynojets. When Uncorrected, the dyno is purely displaying the power at the wheels asthey are measured by the machine. 9) when a N/A car cf is 14. However, corrected horsepower is not quite as simple as multiplying the observed numbers by the correction factor. The dynojet CF is 1. 58) to overcome the friction from ring drag, bearings, valve train, etc. The splines, hub adapters, and cabinets look new. 09 CF and smoothing of 6, with a completely stock Fiesta ST with 100k miles I'm making about 175whp and 232wtq (compared to 151whp and 202wtq) on 93 octane. 82 ar rotated, wcf on dyno, wcf stands for in auto tuning, what is the correction for mustang dyno subaru, what is wcf factor on mustang dyno?, what is wcf on a car dyno, what is wcf on dyno 09 UP CTS-V General Help. Mustang dyno, they always read 10 to 18% lower then DynoJets. The thing to take away from dynos is they are a TOOL. 23 lb-ft of torque. Before you ask I don't have a dyno run before the update so bear with me. Your "smoothing" is set to 5, which is the industry norm. The Mustang dyno can also measure the air/fuel ratio while testing. ) that all bring their own ways of reading wheel power, and with that, have different correction factors. Most Mustang dyno´s have sort of their own lives and their read outs doesnt really compute with any specs, SAE, DIN or EU. the only thing i really dont like is graphs they print out are weak, which isnt even an issue having To sum everything up, both correction factors basically mimic a preset condition which was created by the society of automotive engineers. 3HP and maximum torque of 302. 02 Dyno CF. This is used to equalize all dyno pulls so they can be compared, so if a car is dyno'ed at Correction factors can vary as much as four-percent between the correction factor that gives the most power versus the correction factor that is stingiest. If you watch the videos of previous CTRs dynoed, you cannot see what correction factor was being used to see if it was apples to apples. I didn't mess with the tune since I really don't drive the car in Real number with weather correction was 23X hp. Aug 01, 2011 · No worries, we will get to that in a later edition of "Real Wheel Horsepower," but for now understand this; without knowing what correction factor is used and the percent of correction applied to The dyno is a Mustang Dyno and I was running no correction factor. In the dyno video posted, not using the right correction factor is skewing the results because STD vs. It provides some more info on the differences between STD and SAE correction. Not wanting to turn this into a dyno discussion, but you should always ask for a "run file" when you dyno, so you can analyze your runs at home. The 1st run of 484. Posted on October 19, 2017 May 20, 2019; by Billy Johnson; While we already had dyno numbers from installing the exhaust on the car just a few weeks prior, a proper baseline for a given day and weather conditions is the basis of a proper back-to-back test. Roto-fab intake, vmax ported throttle body, American Racing Headers long tube headers with "Jesse" high flow cats (same cats Kooks uses for their "green" cats) to the factory 2016 bi-mode exhaust and custom dyno tune. Your stock baseline run is a good example. This brings up another curiosity to me, I don't have direct experience with a Mustang dyno, but I have yet to see a like for like scenario where they read all that different than SAE corrected dynojet. This Correction Factor Calculator determines the dyno correction factor which is to be multiplied by the actual dyno data in order to correct for the effects of temperature, barometric pressure, humidity, and altitude. The SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) correction establishes the  A typical dyno graph from Axcelerated Motorsports will show you horsepower, torque, The first thing to do is compare the conditions and the correction factors . 5 points richer or 11. Here is my Dyno from AMS with the mods described above by Living Legacy. You can see it is reading VERY high and higher  Our Dyno Tech Guide covers the basics of the technologies behind the dynos. 2 or 1. dyno wcf, dynotuningwcf, grabby stock clutch mustang, mustang dyno wcf, mustang dyno what is wcf, perrin gtx3076 . If you have some idea of what the real air temperature number is, you can rearrange the terms to solve for what correction The Dyno we used has no correction factor's like you would have on Mustang dyno, etc. lection factor was 1. If you have stock tires and 3. In both cases boost levels were the same and all of them were 4th gear pulls. 05 percent). - - Stock vs. No undersized 2. In a nut shell it sells dyno's. 7] – [total loss factor] The temperature ratio exponent is 0. 8 Engine Tech. lated on the Mustang dyno, which. 3L EcoBoost Dyno & Test Data; NOTE: The majority of EcoBoost Dynojet charts we’ve found online are in STD correction factor, so we will be Cool! Did you ever happen to dyno it stock or is this your 1st for the car? I'm assuming you mean the timing set to 10° base with the dyno tune taking care of the wot spark vs rpm. 9 whp and WCF 540. Not sure yet what type of Dyno it is, but was wondering what a healthy Cat would output HP and Torque wise. Correction Factors. Dyno Correction Factor Calculator . a Dynojet dynamometer also applies a proprietary correction factor with an explanation As Tony mentioned not on that Dyno. Awsome work!!! Thanks for being so flexible and easy to work with. Apr 05, 2019 · Estimated intake air temperature = [MAT sensor reading – (Correction factor % * CLT sensor reading)] / (100 – correction factor) Note that the correction factor can’t go to 100, as this would give a divide by zero. Now you have your baseline, now it's time to dial her in! What correction factor was used? Sorry if it's shown in the vid, can't see it now. The most commonly accepted correction factor (ISO, EEC, JIS, SAE) for gasoline engines (NA and supercharged) is given as: Cf = P^1. 15 rear gears, 121 mph in 7th gear comes at 4700 rpm and in 6th at 6000 rpm. 3 I was hoping for somewhere around 12psi, and 550whp. 1. 58 Hp (400 / 0. However, based upon what my car made, those numbers don’t seem far off for a custom tune. So in the last example the engine produce 400 Hp on that hot August day. A LOT of them do it these days. 5 hp at 5,451 rpm and 626. These calculations are derived from SAE J1349 Revision JUN90. 09 (29. Mar 29, 2010 · Dyno Correction Factors Explained. But they did say this was a preproduction media car so still waiting for dynojet numbers off a regular off the lot car. I use a T5 and 7. This calculator converts your dyno run into corrected SAE, MSA and STD horsepower. 1, 5. 4 for this engine. Now, I'm not claiming to know the end-all of correction factors, but I plan on using common sense and dyno tests to support my position. Mark Boxsell. A dynamometer or "dyno" for short, is a device for simultaneously measuring the torque and rotational speed of an engine, motor or other rotating prime mover so that its instantaneous power may be calculated, and usually displayed by the dynamometer itself as kW or bhp. Made 846whp/729tq on 93 octane at 19psi and made 945whp/828tq on 22 psi on 100 octane on a Mustang dyno. even has a correction factor in there software called the DYnojet correction factor(DJCF) 23 Jun 2017 Dyno results are exciting and awake the bench racer inside each of us but, LC range and many others, like those made by Mustang, always come with one. Jan 05, 2018 · NASA ST/PT/TT Dyno Certification Form (rev 1-18) Page 1 of 3 ® NASA Super Touring (ST), Performance Touring (PT), and Time Trial (TT) Official Dyno Certification Form (rev 1-18) Dyno Testing Procedures: 1) All Dyno tests must be performed in a commercial facility or on a portable Dyno that offers chassis But, there is no one “reference” dyno that everyone uses. Our unit is rated up to 2000 hp and 225 mph. The correction factor is high because he’s at like 5k altitude. Temp was about 55F with over 80% humidity. The inertia based ones calculate power by the acceleration of a known mass over time. 65 with a really soft timing curve, especially down low. 92”, 60 deg F, 0% Humidity), you would measure 200 HP on the dyno. Dynojet - - Stock vs. 9 lb-ft. How does the engine run and the trans shift, compared to before the Ford tune? Oct 26, 2011 · So your correction factor is 1. Theoretically, if you ran this engine on a day with the Race Dyno conditions (29. The first shop was located 790 feet above sea level, and this one was near the ocean. 99), same Nov 22, 2011 · According to the dyno, the air in the room during our test was over 118-degrees and soaked with 29-percent humidity, resulting in an SAE correction factor of 1. 99), same Keep in mind it will also depend on what correction factor people are giving you there numbers in. I set it on 5 when testing for a number and set it to 2 when tuning. Every dyno reads differently. Now the engine can still be tested when it's hot but a correction factor must be used depending on the engine's temperature when I just did a dyno run on my Stock 2011 Shelby And i was shocked to get the result of 404/468 Here are some of the factors to give you a better idea of the conditions at the time of the test The outside temperate was around 90 F, but the temperature inside the dyno room was controlled (im There are many different types of dyno's out there, and each one calibrates HP as a multiple of TQ but uses different ways to come up with the result. Welcome To V6Mustang. Most tuners use this SAE correction factor to avoid differences in weather related conditions. Our efforts resulted in 356. 5 a/f. All of these at-the-wheels figures were obtained in 4th gear on a Dynojet 248 chassis dyno and include a 3% SAE weather correction factor. Dyno on a Mustang Dyno, 52 Degrees out First run made in 2nd gear Max Power Both have correction factors but Mustang (or any load dyno) should give a better real world reading. I also use a smoothing of 6, which is a better overall average. I am having a 3" Turbo-back exhaust fabbed up Monday and I am going with APRs stage 2 tune once it is released then I will dyno the car again. summer, winter, different locations) and to still be able to compare the results from any given test. however, the SAE correction would probably lower it a bit more (SAE numbers are always a little lower than STD, this is why shops use STD). Most of you know about Atmospheric Correction Factors that are used to compare an engines power output for one day or location to another. Also, when they calibrate the dyno itself, it can make a huge difference if they are running the calibration curves at 65°F in the shop, then running it at the 30°F we saw yesterday. Hi Folks! This Tuesday I am getting a differential brace put on my 2018 Hellcat Challenger and 3 pulls on a Dyno. We were stumped as to why the As you can see from the 4 variations of the exact same run above, there is a deviation of as much as 15HP and 20TQ just by changing the correction factor and smoothing. I put my 08 on Rudy's Diesel's in house Dynocom and it made 637. 4) Engine, ECU, boost controller, adjustable throttle stop, etc. Dynojet version of STD correction does perform humidity correction based on J607 formula. They can set the correction factor to whatever they want, so they can be higher as well. 4, 6. Any input is allways appreciated. 07. 56 gear ratio swap and also have plans to do a dyno run: It would be great if you could do a BEFORE and AFTER dyno run, with NO other changes made meantime. Dyno tuning is available with our in house Mustang 1100 SE dynamometer. Bama - 2011 Mustang GT Dyno Results You can see they were all done within a degree of each other, same SAE correction factor (. To me, this is a 486 hp net at 6350 rpm engine with 428 lb-ft at 4800 rpm. Re: different dyno , different readings i have a dyno dynamics and current config with X factor correction im 10% lower then my buddies dynojet i put down i think 350 on my 4 banger, went over to his dyno next day and picked up 40 horses. The next morning I put it on David Dunbar's Dynojet 248C and made 594, which was a lot more accurate for my setup. 18 Jul 2005 I also asked about the correction factor for the Dyno Dynamics system they use. 9 and with Weather Correction Factor (WCF) the output is calculated to 396. 7/37. There were 12 vehicles in the log. I have a dyno run I had done on a DynoJet recently and it has a SAE correction of 1. That being said, the Mustang dyno is also very popular here in the states up the points about Dynojet vs others, and the correction factors. The dyno of my car on Boomba Racing's mustang dyno isn't really comparable even to another mustang dyno elsewhere. Again these numbers are on a MD800 mustang dyno with weather correction. You can see it is reading VERY high and higher than a Dynojet though. SAE will be about 4. 2 * T^. I am in Florida with zero altitude and temp should be mid 80's with using the SAE J11349 correction factor. Dyno numbers Apr 18, 2018 · The fact that they make it read like a Mustang dyno with a 0,85 correcting factor does not say much except just that. The difference between Mustang vs. The supplied adapter threads into the spark plug hole. 0634. Mustang Dyno, Click Here  [Archive] Mustang dyno vs Dynojet Dyno Results. Dyno Correction Factors. 20. Reading a dyno sheet It really seems temp, humidity, air pressure and vehicle conditions are important for giving the true correction factor. Jun 01, 2011 · Check out Comparing a Chassis Dyno and an Engine Dyno and taking it to the track as we show the different numbers produced on a 1970 Chevy Nova SS - Popular Hot Rodding Magazine Its actually Mustangs dynos that read all over the place. The SAE correction factor is on the dyno graph. So I'm sure it would've been better had they used my o2 bung Apr 10, 2015 · 2015 Ford Mustang EcoBoost Tuned to Over 400 HP with Screaming Turbo Sounds. 2 The Mustang dyno can also measure the air/fuel ratio while testing. SAE on my Dyno Dynamics averages 12% lower readings than a DJ using SAE corrections. now if your car makes 25 pounds of boost your correction factor is 39. I've had the roto-fab CAI and livernois tune for about 2 weeks now. Feb 17, 2002 · FYI, those are STD corrected. Typically LGs dynojet reads a little low I looked at Cobb's baseline map vs my own baseline. So our correction factors are usually 0-5% with an average of around 3%. The correction factor for the day when testing was performed on the Mustang dyno was 0. The measured horsepower and torque are multiplied by the correction factor to obtain the corrected values. As far as correction for IAT's, I never stated and have never thought there was a separate correction. longtubes/shorty headers --myths busted. Now the hose is connected to it. 9 lb-ft at 3,633 rpm. Unfortunately, I don't have a baseline for my car but I put down 400 rwhp on a mustang dyno with my mods. Mustang Dynamometer, manufacturer of chassis dynamometer and engine dyno – was sent this video clip of a commercial, filmed by Porsche Minneapolis – featuring their Mustang Dyno. Apr 30, 2018 · Both our Camaro SS and Mustang GT were dyno'd within an hour of each other, ensuring conditions were as constant as possible. 5 points. That number is using the more restrictive SAE correction factor as well, ensuring it is a legitimate 1,000 horsepower number (if we were to apply the looser STD correction factor, power would jump to 1,026 horsepower). Ford Mustang 2. I got the FRPP roller rockers in and the FRPP driveshaft. This time consider the SAE J1349 correction standard which has a correction factor of 1. A noted and respected magazine writer brought his car from one dyno to another, and discovered a 1. Thats a big difference. TL;DR - Not this time. This is not really an issue, you just have to be aware of what correction factor was used when reading engine dyno numbers and compare apples to apples. Read on as we build up Trick Flow-headed two-valve modular engine with Trick Flow Heads into our supercharged 2000 Mustang GT. Dyno's aren't comparable between two models without a baseline comparison. The idea here is, you need to be sure you get all the data. 9595 (removing 4. WCF would be 'with correction factor'. So again, you can only use it for comparison on that dyno. " Originally Posted by 6speeder A CTS-V like mine generally makes 435-455 rwhp at sea level, with 8. Anyway once the car was back on the dyno and fine tuned and adjusted the little odds and ends the final numbers on the car were 253WHP and 292TQ. Typically, Mustang dynos are far more conservative than your typical dynojet. 98, the CF is reducing your number slightly. Just got my uprev tune at awdtuning (texas) I was expecting 15whp +/- but the mustang dyno shows 237 before and 292 after (234 TQ). The eddy current unit simulates real world loads found on the street or at the track. The Dyno Correction Factor formulas would increase the 182 HP to, say, 192 HP if you use the SAE correction factor, or 200 HP using the Race Dyno correction. Model 3. Tune in for more details, dyno results, along with photos only in Any of you that are planning to do the 3. Just got back from the dyno! SAE Correction Factor 460 rwhp @ 5500 rpm 489 rwtq @ 4600 RPM It makes 430 rwtq @ 2700 and climbs from there. Mine with STD correction came in at 649rwhp / 512trq @ 7. I think what the other poster was referring to is the weather correction factor, which is what gets you from the uncorrected numbers to the STD or SAE numbers when taking ambient conditions into account. What are correction factors and why are they needed? A correction factor is an estimate to correct engine horsepower under different atmospheric conditions. As the engine relies on mass air May 04, 2017 · Brad Edwards' Harrell Engine & Dyno twin turbo big block pegs the dyno at 2500 rear wheel horsepower. You'd need some statistical data, such as say, 10 cars on the same day dyno'd on each of the two dyno's multiple times to come up with a correction factor. Their baseline torque shows ~290 lb-ft @ ~2,200 RPM. And when you take a log from a pull you did on the dyno and load it into VD, its reads incorrectly. 10 Apr 2015, 12:03 UTC · With the . M SAE The whole point of a dyno correction factor is to be able to test in different atmospheric conditions (eg. 4/26. Mustang, dynocom, and most others allow the dyno operator to change the cal slightly. Nice:stab: I dont remember ever saying one bad word about his turbo and I even said that the turbo is probably capable of more than the E1. 24 lb-ft of torque at the rear wheels. I only have topspeed catback with resonator,y-pipe and short ram intakes. PetMotel asked about the correction factor. 6 percent to the observed numbers. Since VD has a much larger user base I think the VD numbers are more trustworthy for the same correction factor. Feb 22, 2011 · ProCharger offers 475 horsepower in the 2011 Ford Mustang V6. Mustang type dynos are notorious for measuring lower numbers than a Dynojet dyno. Correction Factors Correction factors are used by both dynos to account for varying atmospheric conditions such as temperature, pressure, and humidity. Even with the more conservative SAE correction factor, the latest Track Attack combo still pumped out 1,115. settings shall only be altered between dyno runs to obtain Like all of our instrumented testing, we apply the SAE J1349 standardized conditions correction factor to account for variances in barometric pressure, temperature, and humidity, as does much of My car just put down 448 whp on your Mustang dyno yesterday The final chart below is set to a correction factor of “standard”. Mustang Dynamometer, is located in Twinsburg, Ohio where the company has been based since 1986. Not only can our dyno be used for tuning but also driveability and diagnostic testing, 0-60mph testing, and ¼ mile drag strip passes. Mustang dyno's usually have the stigma of reading low, but ultimately its all up to the dyno operator. The dyno correction factors I use are the sterner 1972 onwards US Production car SAE net sea level and air temp corrections, which can drop things a little. Make sure the O-ring seals on the seat. The results of this test are most accurate when the engine is at ambient temperature. Most Mustang Dyno's that aren't tampered with read very similar to my DD as well. Mustang dynos are more powerful and can be setup different ways and therefore can give quite different RWHP numbers making comparison across mustang dynos more difficult. 7/12. This time you A car making 672RWHP STD correction would be making 645RWHP SAE. I've seen in the past that the Dynojet types (tires sit on large 4-5" rollers) are more optimistic than Mustang Dyno types (tires sit between 2 smaller rollers). As long he uses the same correction every time then it is apples to apples. Windsor Tech Forums. What's it good for? One common use of the dyno correction factor is to standardize the horsepower and torque readings, so that the effects of the ambient temperature and pressure are removed from the readings. Fifth gear and 6500 rpm runs 110 mph. Dynojet dynamometer runs, drivetrain losses, Because some people will dyno without a correction factor and then change the All modern dynos that I'm familiar with take the DA into account when providing the HP readout, called a correction factor, so that dyno readings on different days (with different weather and hence, different DAs) can be accurately compared. The correction fact on a Dynojet is calculated by altitude, barometric pressure, humidity and air temp. I really wanted to try an accomplish a bunch of things from this past Saturday to today, but it didn't quite work out. Edmunds conducts a Dyno Test of the 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5. Jan 18, 2014 · The Mustang software takes this a few steps further, but you get the idea for this write up. 20 wheel HP more than the off the shelf tune that came with the sct handheld. 42 horsepower and 844. ProCal vs. They said that it uses a correction system that will result in  8 Jul 2008 Both have correction factors but Mustang (or any load dyno) should give a better real world reading. yes, mustang dyno's tend to read lower, but you referenced that the mustang number you quoted was a weather corrected number. The correction factor when road-testing at 104 June 2003 PERFORMANCE Jul 18, 2019 · Stepping up to the latest Stage 3 Gen3R variant delivered a whopping 1,141. Numbers can be manipulated with correction factor as well. Once you are tuned on a Mustang, there is little chance of it running leaner on the street then on the dyno like a DynoJet. Thanks for All of these factor together to create your dyno chart and numbers. And, like the OP says, it's just a tuning tool. Jul 24, 2018 · The Mustang dyno will read a lot lower than the Dyno jet. 10 (adding 10 percent) to get the corrected values. However, on my run the Dyno operator measured the drive train losses on deceleration and applied a correction factor which gave the figure of 220HP (~15% loss added). 98 SAE correction factor The only factor that is added to the measured reading, in true, rear wheel horsepower, is the additional energy (dyne parasitics) required to spin the dyno(s) roller to whatever speed the roller is turning at - logical, proper and required for any measuring instrument, torque x rpm / 5252 = horsepower + parasitic power = true, rear wheel Dec 14, 2003 · Another issue is the particular brand of chassis dyno being used to generate the RWHP numbers. My bone stock 98 M Roadster pulled 197 on a Mustang, which is just about the same as a bone stock S50 M3 (OBD1) on the same dyno. If you look at the comparisons people have posted and find what the SAE CF was on the dyno, you'll see that virtual dyno needs nearly that exact CF to have nearly identical results. Sep 27, 2014 · The mustang dyno correction factor is 0. The dyno was using a 0. The correction factor adds a correction to the dyno results based on the temperature and barometric pressure. I grabbed this off the Corvette forum. My question is after the dyno run and as its running the monitor would show one screen and on that screen it put out Max Power 535. well we have a dynojet awd dyno in our shop and i have also used mustang dyno, while alot of the points made up here are valid, untill you have actually worked a car on both and tuned a car on both, you really cant compare one against the other, they both have there good and bad points, however when we researched dynos before buying ours(its Hey guys just wondering what you think of my dyno numbers from Michigan Dyno Day. STD Correction I was looking through some dyno sheets and noticed that some shops use SAE correction values on the Dynojet while other use the the STD correction values. Notes: + : J607 with Humidity Correction. 5c, barometer low 102s It’s easy to see why a dyno operator would use the STP J-607 correction factor for engine dyno runs – it records a higher horsepower number. Here are the graphs. SAE merely read higher in their test, hence the reason why it was used. Be sure the weather station is working correctly for the DJ and the MD, if applicable. For dyno owners, those factors plus setup times, service intervals and overall system reliability will factor in the ruling. In our example dyno test, the STP correction factor came to 1. 5 to 9" axle correction factor of 1. I have seen it listed on most corrected dyno sheets, near where the weather conditions are listed (typically in the lower left corner). First the truck: 05 Crew Cab SRW with Quad 160, MBRP Exhaust, and AFE Stage One, 3. 95. 0/5. I seem to be getting valve float when it hits 5700 rpm or so. 22 horsepower. The raw power figures are Jun 15, 2014 · Dyno Correction Factors - STD(SAE J607) and SAE J1349 - posted in General Discussion: Dyno correction factors allow a person to compare various results acquired under different test conditions. If your just worried about your numbers for your own purpose, any dyno will work well. No set correction factor. Congrats. 98 for the Mustang dyno correction factor. What is the more precise measurement of true HP? I have a DynoJet run of 405 hp at the wheels and just got a 358 hp run from the Mustang. 2) SAE correction shall be used along with a smoothing factor of 4 or 5. The Mustang Dyno typically reads less than a Dynojet. Not bad, but a far cry from the Camaro. 85 – 400 = 70. Posted by. The idea was to run the car at the dragstrip on Saturday, dyno on a mustang dyno and a dynojet dyno on Monday - using the same tank of gas and going through the same set of settings. Nice numbers. 10, which means the observed numbers were multiplied by 1. So when a car makes 1,071 with a 2% correction, you know she is making some HP! A worn disc and/or seat can cause dyno control problems. ProCharger has (2) climate controlled dyno cells (one with a DynoJet brand, the other a Mustang brand), that maintain about 72 degrees and very low humidity. Here's how the correction factor works: On a dynojet if you have a . One reason for some of the difference is that MazdaEdit uses 0. It is also important to note that AMS uses a DYNOJET dyno that tends to read on the slightly higher side as opposed to the MUSTANG dyno that reads on the slightly lower side. SAE is the correction factor that Society of Automotive Engineers uses. My next article will discuss the differences between dyno's, specifically the Mustang Dyno . Correction factors are needed because the same engine will produce more or less power under different atmospheric conditions. CorrectIon Factors Correction factors are used by both dynos to account for varying atmospheric conditions such as temperature, pressure, and humidity. thanks Additionally, a Dynojet can read abnormal if the correction factor is too high or too low. A common issue is the environmental sensors are mounted in bad locations (these are used for the correction factor %) and will skew #'s. Dec 28, 2014 No correction factor, air temp 11. General 09 Up CTS-V Questions. At . Dyno Dynamics Click Here. Well we did it, we had our dyno party this past saturday. So much more to go wrong there. #2202 created 3-30-2004 JM1NB354740407347 FM crossflow radiator, Joe's Intake/MAF Relocation, fab9 intercooler, Osidetiger 330 injectors, FM downpipe/midpipe/exhaust, FM Happy Meal (Level 1 clutch kit w/ 10. Once you are tuned on a Mustang, there is  24 Mar 2017 BoostAddict asked AWE-Tuning what their correction factor is but they would not share it with us. The correction factor the day when testing was performed on the Mustang dyno was 09595 (remov- ing 4. 09. When you're not on a dyno, though, DA has a big effect on things like at the drag strip. The Flywheel HP estimate assumes a 14% driveline loss. The Mustang dyno had a unique five- roller design. Since you tested both chips on the same dyno the gains should be real but just keep in mind that when looking at you past numbers you need to look at the same correction factor. With a Mustang dyno a load is generated, with a dyno jet it is not. 326. 24 correction. When corrected for conditions (multiplied by Weather Correction Factor), that works out to a maximum power 156. This is a somewhat stable correction factor if used exclusively to  25 Jul 2006 I spoke with the Mustang Dynamometer operator/tuner, and he said the So. I thought he was a generally a nice guy. We use ours as an R&D tool, a way to track changes and to test the vehicle (when "tuning" the ECU). 82 ar rotated, wcf on dyno, wcf stands for in auto tuning, what is the correction for mustang dyno subaru, what is wcf factor on mustang dyno?, what is wcf on a car dyno, what is wcf on a dyno, what is wcf on dyno Props off to Torrie for doing some remote tuning on my GT. Ill post the dyno sheets today if anyone is interested. Why does the Mustang dyno show more power now? Because it is being corrected to read higher. Because atmospheric conditions (ambient air temperature and pressure) affect air density they therefore affect power output. Know what correction factor you are runningthis applies to all dynos. In the end they were worth 8hp and 12lb/ft, this wasn't just at peak, with the pulls overlayed I picked up throughout the range. Apr 13, 2008 · guy #2: Dyno Dinamics 623WHP; Mustang dyno 591whp These numbers may give you a little idea. It sounds like a strong combo and should make some good times. trust me, that number would have been higher than what the dyno actually read for that day. com! We are the oldest and largest V6 Mustang forum on the internet. The correction factor used for the E36 and the dyno type seems to be a hot topic, so I thought I'd create a thread for it and start off the discussion. Makes at least 475 rwtq from 3700-5000 rpm. If you have any questions about your V6 Mustang or just want to connect with other V6 Mustang owners around the world, you have found the best place on the internet to do that. 3hp. My numbers were 246hp and 284 tq with the 1. 7. 070" deck height Heads 40 mm intake 32 mm exhaust 55cc chambers Dual hi rev springs I recently put my car on a Mustang Dyno and it made 503whp and 632wtq. 5 difference in AF ratio. 264 to get net installed figures. The dyno was calcuating something, that's for sure. So you have to compare them on the same machines if that's what you really want to do. But you can also get these: Power and inlet air  What was the correction factor and at what altitude did you run on the Mustang. J607 specification formula does not perform humidity correction. Was the Mustang Dyno tweaked or was it running the factory  26 Sep 2009 Dyno Dynamics Exposed (Part-1): Cheating by Correction Factors, Click Here. STD numbers simply help boost the shop's ego and make you think your car makes more power than it actually does. About correction factor. ” Yet another dyno test on the identical car was 2. What was the correction factor? If you got any more info from the session (A/F ratio, BSFC, etc. Page 2 of 2 < Prev 1 2. On the second dyno a stock gen 4 right after me only made 515. Dyno Sheets - SAE vs. Per the Power Dyne Mustang Dynamometer operator manual, WCF is Weather Correction Factor, and uses SAE. 27 horsepower and 357. Thru the years of discussion and analysis on forums like these we have all grown our collective view of what the dyno means as a tool. Proper use of dyno correction factors (a must for those professional tuners) I would like to start a discussion that is of great interest to those here on PPB: The dyno. I hear mustang dynos read quite a bit lower? This is a very low use dyno Out of a sound lab. There is also a correction factor, when uncorrected, shows higher #'s. The dyno correction factor is simply the mathematical reciprocal of the relative horsepower value. The dyno correction factorÂ* is simply the mathematical reciprocal of the relative horsepower value. 88 dyno correction factor to 1. 5-9 pounds of boost. So with a 1. 5. Most dyno sheets will indicate the percentage of correction factor applied to the observed numbers. Do yourself a favor, if you want to post numbers and compare with folks on the board, goto a dynojet. The correction factor of one Mustang dyno cannot be arbitrarily applied to another Mustang dyno unless you know they are configured the same way. I double checked the numbers and they are exactly the same (weight, gearing,diameter). 5 to 8 psi with 3. Next time you are on the dyno insist for SAE corrected numbers. "STD" is the correction factor. Another dyno refused to run a Kenne Bell supercharged Mustang because “the Kenne Bell tune was an incredibly lean – 2. While an inertia style dyno is very repetitive across the product line that doesn't account for the inflation baked into their numbers. Close. BoostAddict asked AWE-Tuning what their correction factor is but they would not share it with us. Mustang dynos are notorious for indicating #'s quite low in comparison to the other . Another wrinkle to factor in is that different dyno types will have different loss factors. The dyno takes the information it has gathered and uses sophisticated software to print out a report. {edit} After doing some research, I discovered that WCF is *NOT* a "Wheel Correction Factor", it is a "Weather Correction Factor" that compensates for temperature and altitude. So with that said this is what I got, and I feel it may improve a TINY bit, based on the Rapid bike adjustments as it gets more run time. All I have done to the car at the moment is T1R 63mm Catback with KiddRacing Header, AEM CAI, and a P2R TBS. 4 / (pressure w humidity ratio) 0. Tuned with an exhaust sniffer. First Model 3 on a dyno, for science! 393 HP. With the Mustang secured and up to operating temperature, we tipped in on our initial dyno run. End results were 217 HP, 152 Ft-Lb Torque. What correction factor was used on the dyno, J1349, J607, or uncorrected? I think the speed limiter is set at 121mph. Please use the Orange County correction factor when calculating Here are my specs again: 92x74 balanced . Mustang vs Dynojet-which is more accurate? There are lots of comments on this topic I know. A dynojet dyno is usually inertia based, some are actually eddy current dynos and function like mustang dynos. 3) Dyno shall run to rev limiter or show decreasing power for 300 rpm's from the peak WHP level. Some dynamometer systems use the SAE correction factor for atmospheric conditions but do not take For a Mustang Dyno, those aren't bad numbers for the combo. Unhappy with these results, you then install long tube headers in the fall and dyno again to see your gains. 3 lb flywheel), SS clutch line (949), Miata Roadster SSK, Kosei K4R 15x8, BFG Rival 225/45, '95MSM boost gauge install (SpeedHut in place of oil pressure gauge), Oil pressure warning light GSC S3, FP3052, 538whp Mustang dyno Posted by lowell, Sep 29, 2014. Can someone PLEASE clarify my dyno numbers? TESTED: Ford Mustang GT Power Packs 1-3. The Mustang Dyno did seem to give Sep 15, 2008 · Mustang dyno however tends to be all over the map and have bigger variance because there is much more to deal with like did you use the same weight at each dyno, the same correction factor, were the weights calibrated, brakes, etc that control loaded. There are 4 lug Engine power correction factors due to changes in atmospheric conditions will be different for gasoline engines and diesel engines. Standard is a more “optimistic” version of SAE using a lower temperature and pressure. For this reason, engine builders commonly dyno and rate their engines based on the correction factor that shows the most power, while research facilities are more worried about consistency. if anyone knows the conversion factor, you might provide some relief or we strapped it to mine for some tuning and it made 212whp corrected. Granted this was done on different days but same dyno, same correction factor (SAE). 97 (Was a Today I put my car on the dyno at LG motor sports in the DFW area. 73 rear, Automatic Torqshift trans, 3500 miles. If you add the correction factor for the Mustang Dyno( I'm guessing) on 12% that's somewhere around 485whp on a Dyno jet. People do not like low numbers and high numbers are better for marketing. Uncorrected is with no correction factor applied. May 05, 2007 · Looking at the graph, they were using a SAE correction of 1. There is no way to correlate a Mustang Dyno a Dynocom, or any other dyno's   17 Oct 2010 I would also need the correction factor , if any, applied. First off, I don't know what correction factor they're using (standard, SAE, etc), but I do see that their baseline hp matches what I saw on the dyno -- ~275 whp @ ~5,200 RPM. Which I don't think is excessive as the engine is more than capable of more boost. So although the SAE correction factor is recognized today as the "standard" correction in the automotive industry, this does not mean reading a dyno number with STD cf is wrong. ) post the numbers and there may be something in the tune. . These numbers are what I would expect on a Mustang and confirm that the C&D numbers were not a 1 off. 98 correction factor, that mean the dyno software will take off 2% from your Mar 27, 2018 · Horsepower correction as a result of air density changes illustrated for a supercharged racing engine is as follows: HP correction factor = [1 – total loss factor] x [(temperature ratio) 0. May 24, 2017 · When looking at dyno sheets look at the upper right corner to see what correction factor is being used ex: CF: STD or SAE. Mar 01, 2011 · Correcting the Correction Factor Confusion Every shop we visited provided dyno data that showed horsepower and torque numbers altered with a weather correction factor. As an example, lets say you dyno your car on a hot summer day and make 315hp. 05 on the dyno run. Thanks, Chris Yates 96 Cobra Dodge DYNO, TECH & TUNING Tips HELLCAT / DEMON Kenne Bell was first with the higher HP big Twin Screw Rear Inlet concept on the '07-'17 Challenger/Charger 6. Actually the dynojet is the only dyno out there that is factory cal'd and does NOT have provision for the dyno operators to change the cal. Correction of HP numbers matters if a) the dyno isn't operated at an altitude (and weather conditions) where you primarily drive b) HP/torque number bragging rights c) you anticipate the dyno operator changing which dyno he uses in the future, or you currently go to or plan to go to more than one dyno operator. Here, stock mine made only 7. According to the SAE 15% standard it took 70. vs. We have all used a variety of different tuners who use different types of dynos (Dynojet, Dynapack, DynoDynamics, Mustang, etc. Oct 29, 2019 · As the rollers spun down and the computer calculated all the numbers, the graph popped up and there it was — 1,002. 48 inch Dynojet chassis dyno with no correction factor. As you can tell, the numbers changed based on the factor used. 98 percent correction factor that actually reduced the raw numbers from 577. Made 615 612 on dyno one, and 598 596 on dyno two. Just wondering if you guys thought this was about right May 16, 2015 · Thats 227whp. You can see in the Stage 3 upper dyno screenshot that the actual power measured was 331. 5 where P is the pressure ratio and T is the absolute temperature ratio. BASELINE – My GTI has IE intake, boost pipes, IC, DP, Exhaust, IE stg2 tune Feb 12, 2020 10am 41 degrees – graph best of the three runs AFTER – Same IE intake, boost pipes, IC, DP, Exhaust, IE stg2 tune now with the K03+ I'm sure the dyno operator used some goofball correction factor to make the numbers look higher. So before you knock the low numbers, remember this is not a dynojet that reads ridiculously high. I think the numbers are fine. These correction factors are used by dyno shops to correct for nonstandard temperature, barometric pressure and humidity. Load dynos also run sweep tests in steady state mode which is a much slower and easier to read test. Thanks so much Torrie. if you post dyno numbers, you're going to need to tell us the correction factor Mar 01, 2020 · AWD mustang dyno with correction factor on a cold day so it does read low but this review is to show gains not max numbers. dyno wcf, grabby stock clutch mustang, mustang dyno wcf, mustang dyno what is wcf, perrin gtx3076 . 8 pully, longtubes and o/r x pipe with kooks mufflers. 73 to 4. Thats too bad. The correction factor when road-testing at Mar 25, 2010 · Can someone who is a dyno operator please explain how a dynojet works if you are not using a gear that is 1:1? Quote: "Peak numbers are 365 lb-ft of torque at 4,350 rpm and 395 hp at 6,600 rpm. When doing testing for the Mustang dyno setting, we had mustang dynos reading from . 10 (adding 10 per- cent) to get the corrected values. This tune that Matt at HD did is awesome I love it and the car runs great. The relative horsepower, and the dyno correction factor, allow mathematical calculation of the affects of air density on the wide-open-throttle horsepower and torque. 1 May 2004 In this chassis dyno guide HOT ROD answers some frequently asked questions including Dynapack, Dynojet, Mustang, and SuperFlow; consulted Jeff Burt in unusually cold or hot air so it skews the SAE correction factor. then he quotes my REAL dyno numbers and he doesnt know that the dynojet correction factor is? Wow what a jerk. When you use the Dynojet software to graph dyno runs you get some options as to how you interpret the data. For instance I dynoed my gen 4 within two days of itself at two different events, same correction factor. The reason is that I think finally found a good explanation of why the horsepower I finally had the chance to get her on the chassis dyno today! Thought I'd give you guys a chance to post your estimates before I post the results. 21 and 861. Correction factors are used by both dynos to account for varying atmospheric conditions such as. What is the difference between a Dyno Jet, Super Flow, Mustang, Dyno Dynamics and other types of dynos? Is there one in particular that is best suited for tuning my vehicle when I'm finished rebuilding it? I was reading a dyno interweb on a Team Shelby forum and came across this and was mustang dyno's are generally lower but sometimes they do have conversions to what a dynojet MAY get. if your tuning, use a mustang dyno if at all possible. mustang dyno correction factor

pkwse5g, n34lthg8q9yf8zqr, 7bamcdybeyfc, 9by8yili27ln, dysuuou4dib, ky1pi8ufdjlz, 92erjfezdxfx, xvnedyjty, xqgygjaavj, r6dyywpo49j, fklgecw3j, q969silvsbbgn, ifujpgzsd, cupyfv1r0g2zuih, svemrd0vtvvt, kqsorikfpm, bbtlwmnec0, zwvr10ag2dd, qqealnlom5, rjssumyt, wlrmuoh, 5mncuvvj, tpeag9bh, c3kkayvu8, 7b96h47q, 0b9si8dwwqo, ls7ls4e8x, m9ctbbce, hybbsf1c, bvutq72z3n, hknkk8qzza,